Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ADMEWORKS ModelBuilder

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 18:41, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ADMEWORKS ModelBuilder

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable software. Widely available (at least, widely distributed on various download sites), but not widely reviewed. The one independent mention that could be found (in the book In Silico Toxicology) said of the software that there was insufficient information available to even determine its performance in several key areas. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:16, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:01, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:01, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Non-notable, unsourced, and what content exists reads like an advert. --Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 20:23, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nom for A7 when first started. Mdann52 (talk) 13:50, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. spammy. Harry the Dog WOOF 12:33, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.